CIVIC PERMITREVIEW

The systems, rules, and operating record behind civic approvals.

U.S. state and local government web content and mobile applications within the rule's scope · Federal regulation and official guidance record

Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability; Accessibility of Web Information and Services of State and Local Government Entities

The Title II rule establishes specific accessibility requirements for covered state and local government web content and mobile applications and identifies WCAG 2.1 Level AA as the technical standard subject to the rule's scope and exceptions.

What the authority record establishes

The Title II rule establishes specific accessibility requirements for covered state and local government web content and mobile applications and identifies WCAG 2.1 Level AA as the technical standard subject to the rule's scope and exceptions.

Binding federal regulation within its stated scope; official guidance summarizes but does not replace the regulatory text

The exact official title, issuing body, jurisdiction, version or application record, and linked source define the scope of this page. Readers should not transfer the authority's status to a commercial product or infer transaction-, patient-, system-, site-, or organization-specific applicability from this summary.

Why it matters to this market

Permit portals, plan-upload interfaces, payment flows, maps, status tools, and mobile inspection or resident applications must be evaluated as public digital services rather than optional front-end decoration.

Affected operating stages

  • Service Inventory
  • Accessibility Assessment
  • Remediation
  • Procurement
  • Testing
  • Ongoing Governance

Capabilities to examine

Applicant Portal And Guided Intake

Ask how the system or service identifies the controlling source and version, applies customer-specific interpretation, handles exceptions, preserves human judgment, and retains evidence for applicant portal and guided intake.

Electronic Plan Submission And Version Control

Ask how the system or service identifies the controlling source and version, applies customer-specific interpretation, handles exceptions, preserves human judgment, and retains evidence for electronic plan submission and version control.

Fee Calculation Payments And Reconciliation

Ask how the system or service identifies the controlling source and version, applies customer-specific interpretation, handles exceptions, preserves human judgment, and retains evidence for fee calculation payments and reconciliation.

Public Search Status And Communications

Ask how the system or service identifies the controlling source and version, applies customer-specific interpretation, handles exceptions, preserves human judgment, and retains evidence for public search status and communications.

Mobile And Offline Field Inspections

Ask how the system or service identifies the controlling source and version, applies customer-specific interpretation, handles exceptions, preserves human judgment, and retains evidence for mobile and offline field inspections.

Documents Records Retention And Public Disclosure

Ask how the system or service identifies the controlling source and version, applies customer-specific interpretation, handles exceptions, preserves human judgment, and retains evidence for documents records retention and public disclosure.

Affected buyer audiences

  • digital-service owners
  • permitting and licensing leaders
  • IT and accessibility teams
  • procurement and legal

Implementation questions

  • Which entities, products, populations, transactions, systems, sites, or jurisdictions are actually within scope?
  • What is binding, what is guidance, and what is a technical or consensus standard?
  • Which publication, adoption, effective, application, transition, and enforcement dates differ?
  • Who owns legal, clinical, quality, regulatory, policy, or operational interpretation?
  • How will a source revision affect open work and historical decisions?

Interpretation boundary

The guidance page does not decide a specific entity's legal obligations, exceptions, conformance, effective communication, reasonable modification, or litigation risk.